# Query fanout review report

Report owner / audience / date:
Status: draft; replace every unknown with evidence or keep it explicitly unknown.
Permissions: confirm the material may be shared with this audience.

## Decision requested

- What the recipient should decide:
- Relevant website, language and market:
- Files reviewed, versions and timestamps:
- Evidence classes: native API observation / modelled idea / editorial question / human search data:
- Selected-query scope and exclusions:

## Findings

| ID | Finding | Evidence class | File and field or source location | Supported claim | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | |

## Hypotheses and recommendations

| ID | Hypothesis | Missing check | Recommended action | Existing URL or new task | Owner | Acceptance evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | |

## Measurement and follow-up

- Current measured website result, with exact window/filters, or not measured:
- Release/recrawl reference, if applicable:
- Baseline and next review date:
- Confounders and unresolved questions:
- Cost/privacy/rights limits:
- Next decision and required evidence:

Do not turn source presence into a recommendation, a query count into demand, or a before/after change into isolated causality. Disclose commonly owned sites. Remove private input, account identifiers and unapproved provider output before sharing.